<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nanopool &#8211; Costigator</title>
	<atom:link href="https://costigator.com/tag/nanopool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://costigator.com</link>
	<description>Tech Passion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ethermine vs. Nanopool profitability</title>
		<link>https://costigator.com/cryptocurrency/ethermine-vs-nanopool-profitability/</link>
					<comments>https://costigator.com/cryptocurrency/ethermine-vs-nanopool-profitability/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethermine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanopool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profitability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://costigator.com/?p=953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ethermine and Nanopool are two of the biggest mining pools for Ethereum. But which one is the profitablest? Some days ago I startet a comparison and now I want share the result with you. Configuration For the comparison I have used four rigs: two mining on Ethermine and two mining on Nanopool. They all have the same hardware and software configuration. One rig has a hasing power of ~193 MH/s. Here are the details: Hardware Motherboard: ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING CPU: Intel i3-8100 @ 3.6 GHz 5 x GeForce GTX 1070 2 x GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Software EthOS [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethermine and Nanopool are two of the biggest mining pools for Ethereum. But which one is the <strong>profitablest</strong>?</p>
<p>Some days ago I startet a comparison and now I want share the result with you.</p>
<h2>Configuration</h2>
<p>For the comparison I have used four rigs: two mining on Ethermine and two mining on Nanopool. They all have the same hardware and software configuration. One rig has a hasing power of <strong>~193 MH/s.</strong> Here are the details:</p>
<h3>Hardware</h3>
<ul>
<li>Motherboard: ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING</li>
<li>CPU: Intel i3-8100 @ 3.6 GHz</li>
<li>5 x GeForce GTX 1070</li>
<li>2 x GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB</li>
</ul>
<h3>Software</h3>
<ul>
<li>EthOS 1.2.9</li>
<li>Ethermine 0.14.0.dev2</li>
</ul>
<h3>Config</h3>
<pre class="eckosc_syntax eckosc_syntax_theme_default"><code data-language="bash"># global settings
globalminer ethminer
globalmem +470
globalcore 1500
globalpowertune 120
globalfan 90

# rig settings (replace xxxxxx with rig id)
# GPU order: 1070 1070 1060 1060 1070 1070 1070
pwr xxxxxx 120 120 90 90 120 120 120
mem xxxxxx 4270 4270 4650 4650 4270 4270 4270
</code></pre>
<h2>Comparison</h2>
<p>I started all the miners on 2018-04-03 at 20:00 until they <strong>reached 0.2 ETH.</strong> The result is represented in the next picture:</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-963" src="http://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool.jpg" alt="" width="2088" height="1153" srcset="https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool.jpg 2048w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-300x166.jpg 300w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-768x424.jpg 768w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-1024x565.jpg 1024w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-1920x1060.jpg 1920w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-1680x928.jpg 1680w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-1240x685.jpg 1240w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-860x475.jpg 860w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-680x375.jpg 680w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-500x276.jpg 500w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-400x221.jpg 400w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-250x138.jpg 250w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-200x110.jpg 200w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-100x55.jpg 100w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-76x42.jpg 76w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-50x28.jpg 50w" sizes="(max-width: 2088px) 100vw, 2088px" /></p>
<p>The difference is very small. Facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Nanopool reports more (~6.8%) hashing rate than Ethermine.</li>
<li>Nanopool seems to be faster (~2.5%) in the first 24 hours of mining.</li>
<li>Ethermine reached 0.2 ETH in 6 days 15 hours and 42 minutes. Nanopool reached 0.2 ETH in 6 days 17 hours and 33 minutes. <strong>Ethermine is performing ~1.15% better</strong>!</li>
</ul>
<h2>Raw data</h2>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-964" src="http://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data.jpg" alt="" width="1409" height="352" srcset="https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data.jpg 1409w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-300x75.jpg 300w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-768x192.jpg 768w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-1024x256.jpg 1024w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-1240x310.jpg 1240w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-860x215.jpg 860w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-680x170.jpg 680w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-500x125.jpg 500w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-400x100.jpg 400w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-250x62.jpg 250w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-200x50.jpg 200w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-100x25.jpg 100w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-76x19.jpg 76w, https://costigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ethermine-vs-nanopool-raw-data-50x12.jpg 50w" sizes="(max-width: 1409px) 100vw, 1409px" /></p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Ethermine is performing better, so I would choose it <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Please leave a comment if you have done also some tests. It would be nice to compare other results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://costigator.com/cryptocurrency/ethermine-vs-nanopool-profitability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
